You can see the video from MS, which shows a variety of shrink mask applications.
This is similar to the solution to the spread, which is more common in Europe. So we can see that, for most machines, they are built overseas. They also prefer the elastic hood. If it is a typical capital, it invests even more. High speed is a common application. In some cases, the stretch engine runs very fast and can run as much as 100 loads per hour.
Construction area, cost of capital, maintenance and components and complexity are all excluded. Another important planning factor is the consideration of material supply. Generally speaking, the material thickness is within 1 meter. But the scope of the supplier is much smaller than the traditional stretch film.
Finally, energy consumption is introduced by the shrinkable cover solution, because heat is what they rely on and they need to perform the critical systolic function.
In the mid-1990s, patents were granted for the use of adhesive to use a uniform load. This is the same as this example, used to stack large amounts of paper. The use of adhesive with high shear strength but limited tensile strength is the premise of this method. In other words, to load the layer, it will have a lot of resistance to sliding, but to simply pick one thing from the layer below it, it will have very limited resistance.
This is very common in market Mueller solutions. As in the patent documents and proof points out, people see it as an additional process, and then it tensile inclusion “and” can realize the unification of the aim of improving load.
As we all know, the cost of capital equipment for this solution is very low. But, in general, it’s just an alternative.